Selecteer een pagina
Generic selectors
Alleen exacte overeenkomsten
Zoeken in de titel
Inhoudelijk zoeken
Zoeken in posts
Zoeken op pagina's
Generic selectors
Alleen exacte overeenkomsten
Zoeken in de titel
Inhoudelijk zoeken
Zoeken in posts
Zoeken op pagina's

history

History

In the 18th century harmful philo­so­p­hical influ­ences began to incre­a­singly threaten the confessing character of the church. Especially the Enlightment proved to be a great danger to spiritual life. In spite of the decline of the church, manu church members continued to long for true biblical spiri­tu­ality. In the 19th century the Church Order was replaced bij a set of rules, imposed upon the church by the secular government. At the same time, the reformed confes­sions were no longer consi­dered to have a binding character. From this time on, the Dutch reformed churches were referred to as 'Neder­landse Hervormde Kerk' (NHK).

When protests were raised against these devel­op­ments in the church, a Secession followed, beginning in 1834 at Ulrum in the province of Groningen, where Hendrik de Cock was pastor. From this Seces­si­on­mo­vement the CGKN springs. Another movement in the church of the 19th century was the so-called Doleantie of 1886, which took place under the leadership of dr. Abraham Kuyper. His aim was to restore the 'Neder­lndse Hervormde Kerk' from within; but his action resulted in a second secession.

At first the CGKN sympa­thized with the Doleantie. However, certain objec­tions prevailed. These objec­tions concerned the way the Doleantie viewed the 'Neder­landse Hervomde Kerk', and especially the teachings of the infuentail dr. Kuyper regarding the doctrines of baptism and regene­ration. Yet, in 1892 a great majority of churches joined in the unifi­cation process by which the churches were called the 'Gerefor­meerde Kerken in Nederland' (GKN). A small segment of the CGKN found it impos­sible to join with this merger of churches; they held that their objec­tions had not been solved satis­fac­torily. Therefore, they remained as the conti­nuing CGKN.

They were not motivated by secta­ri­anism but they simply desired to remain faithful to the Scrip­tures and the Confession of the church. They valued very strongly the heritage of both the Refor­mation and the Second Refor­mation, which empha­sized the personal experience of faith and the work of the Holy Spirit. During the first years after 1892 the CGKN paid much attention to questions regarding the diffe­rences with the CGKN. The CGKN was convinced that the doctrine of presumptive regene­ration is unbiblical. During these years there was the necessity to rebuild and renew eccle­si­as­tical life.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email